Category Archives: Reviews
Things Metrical
Two quickies for your consideration: Christopher Francese reads Horace’s priamel to Maecenas in the latest Latin Poetry Podcast, and Kiichiro Itsumi’s Pindaric Metre: The Other Half finally gets a proper (and a positive) review. Horace 1.1 is one of the … Continue reading
Farewell, K.J. Dover
I’ve read on rogueclassicism of the death of Kenneth Dover, and thought it might be worth sharing what may be the first assessment of his work as a Hellenist in print. When Kenneth Dover was just 19 (in 1939) Oxford published … Continue reading
Digital Find of the Day: Housman’s Opuscula
This one is a real treat, but very odd: a work on Google Books listed as Opuscula by A.E. Housman. The truth is that no such work was published, and what we have is a poorly scanned PDF of a … Continue reading
Learn to read Etruscan (as well as you possibly can)
Perhaps the most exciting and rewarding class I took as an undergraduate (about 7–8 years ago), was Languages of Ancient Italy with Rex Wallace. We studied and read Old Latin, Faliscan, Oscan, Umbrian, Etruscan, and some other inscriptions. We had … Continue reading
Laryngeal get ya every time!
This, from Wolfgang David Cirilo de Melo’s review of Michiel Arnoud Cor de Vaan’s Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages, is the best and most insightful comment I’ve read in the BMCR in quite some time: Pater … Continue reading
Now that’s what I call a podcast
Christopher Francese, whom I had the pleasure of meeting at Dickinson yesterday (“Active Latin in the Classroom: Strategies for Beginning, Intermediate and Advanced Students” with Milena Minkova and Terence Tunberg), has an excellent series of podcasts on Latin poetry, and … Continue reading
plus uno maneat perenne saeclo
I see that a new introductory Greek textbook has been reviewed in the BMCR, and the reviewer makes comparisons to Athenaze. But how does it compare with Luschnig? I only ask because I want to see my name in print … Continue reading
Dover’s Theocritus: a review (reprint: Bolchazy-Carducci)
As I make my (not so) triumphant return to the field of Mawr’s I feel myself compelled to do something I ought to have done a long time ago. The good folks at Bolchazy-Carducci once thought well-enough of this blog … Continue reading
